| HOMEPAGE
COVER
PAGE
PROPOSAL
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
PROBLEM
STATEMENT
PROJECT
OBJECTIVES PROGRAM
METHODS AND DESIGN
EVALUATION
Process Analysis
Reporting
THE
PROPOSED BUDGET REFERENCES
|
|
Does it work?
Process Analysis
In order to identify what needs to be
evaluated, reviewed, and annually reported for continued compliance with
the Learning Anytime Anywhere Partnerships
Grant, a review of this proposal’s objectives and goals
are restated here:
- Provide an affordable and accessible opportunity for all
high-school graduates to attend college
- Supply local industry with skilled and trained personnel to fill
key positions needed within the company
- Attract outside businesses
- Decrease and substantially reduce the poverty level
- Provide a healthy economic environment for the Region
Reporting
The purpose for an evaluation of this
Project Proposal is to study and monitor how effective and successful
the program’s results are. In other words, is the project
achieving its stated goals and objectives? Is the financial
investment paying off? Therefore, answers
to the following questions will be annually supplied to the Federal
Agency in charge of the "Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs"—beginning with the end of the first year of
operation.
|
ISSUES
FOR ANNUAL GRANT COMPLIANCE Representing
YOUR COLLEGE CONNECTION Tech Centers |
| 1. |
What is the number of students graduating from high schools in Region
X this year? |
| 2. |
What is the number of students enrolling in college each
year through the distance learning Technology Centers (Your College
Connection)? Of that number, how many were graduates from
local high-schools in Region X
that same year? |
| 3. |
What is the class attendance record for all students for
the given year? How many average hours per week did each
student spend at the Technology Center? |
| 4. |
What is the average total college credit hours by
the university registered students in the given year? What ratio of
full-time and part-time students? How many courses were
successfully passed
(total student population), and how many courses were flunked?
How
does that compare with on-campus University of Nebraska students? |
| 5. |
Of all the students enrolled for college credit,
how many of them dropped out during the given year? |
| 6. |
Of all the students enrolled for college credit,
how many graduated in the given year? Of those, how many where awarded Associate Degrees and how many were awarded
four-year degrees? |
| 7. |
How many skilled jobs were filled in Region
X’s industries that year? Of all the skilled
jobs open, how many were not filled? |
| 8. |
How many companies closed down or relocated the
given year in Region
X? |
| 9. |
Did the poverty level in Region X rise
or fall for the year? How much? |
| 10. |
How many new companies began business operations in
Region X for the given year? |
Experimentally, the Tech Centers will also
promote data collection of willing participants. Experimentation
shall be limited to data collection of a non-personal nature only.
Some examples of such data collection would be studies seeking to
quantify the study habits of young students, the interests of older
learners, etc.
Data collected from the Centers will never
identify individuals and will be the property of the Federal Government
and the Tech Centers’ Board of Directors. Nevertheless, valid research
shall be allowed as decided by the governing board, and as finally
approved by the U.S. Department of Education. All other federal
grant requirements will be complied with on a timely basis as received.
BACK
TO TOP
Previous
Page Next
Page |